Hari Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.433 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2018 Thana- MAINATAND District- West Champaran ====================================================== HARI SAH Son of Late Raghunath Sah Resident of Village-Rampurwa, Chapariya Tola, P.S.-Mainatand, District-West Champaran. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Usha Kumari 1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 10.12.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge I-cum-Special Judge, West Champaran at Bettiah, in connection with Mainatand Police Station Case No.74 of 2018, registered under Sections 363/366A/323/504/379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Appellant is father of co-accused Ranjit Kumar who allegedly kidnapped to the minor daughter of the informant with intent to marry with her.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.433 of 2020(3) dt.24-02-2020 2/2 Considering the facts of this case aforesaid, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. (c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T