← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5505/2021dismissed

Parmanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-14Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5505 of 2021 ====================================================== Parmanand Yadav Son of Late Mahesh Yadav Resident of village- Naad, P.o. and P.s.- Karakat, District- Rohtas, presently residing at village- Ganwa, P.o.- Bhadwa Bazar, P.s.- Rafiganj and District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reform, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya 3.

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Aurangabad 4.

The Additional Collector, Aurangabad 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reform, Aurangabad 6.

Rajkishore Singh S/o Deep Narayan Singh Resident of village Naad, P.o. and P.s.- Karakat, District- Rohtas, presently residing at village- Garwa, P.o.- Bhadwa Bazar, P.s.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad 7.

Upendra Singh S/o Ram Iqbal Singh Resident of village- Nasirha, P.o.- Manikpur, P.s.- Kurtha, District- Arwal, presently residing at villageKharokhar, P.o.- Kona, P.s.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad, (Substituted heir of vendor Indu Devi) ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Vyas Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard the parties.

By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the order dated 07.12.2019 passed in Ceiling Revision No. 54 of 2012 by the Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

In view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Punyadeo Sharma and others Vs Kamla Devi reported in 2022 (1) BLJ 434, it has been held that the pre-

Patna High Court CWJC No.5505 of 2021(2) dt.14-11-2022 2/2 emptor has no legal right to claim the land in question. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Harsh/ BT U