Shavnam Ram @ Samod Kumar @ Shravan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7681 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2019 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SHAVNAM RAM @ SAMOD KUMAR @ SHRAVAN RAM S/o Niranjan Ram R/o village- Khokasa Kalyan, P.S.- Desri, Distt- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR, allegation is that six unknown miscreants looted away Rs. 1,50,000/- cash, Aadhar Card, Pan Card and other articles from the informant. It is further alleged that they also snatched key of the bike and mobile, thereafter fled away. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7681 of 2023(3) dt.19-06-2023 2/2 statement of co-accused Navneet Kumar, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 05.03.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 72330 of 2019. He is languishing in judicial custody since 14.06.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.- 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 69 of 2019.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T