Sanjeev Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2562 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- NAWADA ===========================================================

1. Sanjeev Kumar Singh S/o Rajeshwari Singh @ Rajeswari Prasad Singh, R/o Mohalla- Lohiya Nagar, Ward No. 28, House No. 84, P.O.- Sudhird Nagar, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Excise Patna.

2. The District Magistrate , Nawada.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Nawada.

4. The Sub Divisonal Police Officer, Nawada.

5. The S.D.O. Nawada.

6. The Excise Superintendent , Nawada.

7. The Excise Inspector Posted at Integrated Enquiry Chowki, Rajauli, Nawada. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, GA-1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. This writ application has been preferred for release of the vehicle bearing registration No.BR-9E/8221, which was seized in connection with Government Official Case No.168 of 2017 for alleged violation of the Bihar Excise Law.

3. The constitutional validity of the provisions of Sections 56, 57, 58 and 60 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 is under challenge in Cr. W.J.C. No. 2446 of 2017 (Rahul Kumar @ Rahul V. The State of Bihar and others) and the matter is pending

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2562 of 2017 dt.13-12-2017 P2/ before the larger Bench of this Court.

4. Hence, the respondents are directed to release the referred vehicle in favour of the petitioner by way of ad interim custody on execution of bank guarantee of Rs.15,00,000/- (Fifteen Lacs) or sale deed of immovable property of equal value standing in the name of the petitioner to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below/authority concerned where the case is pending, with condition that the petitioner would not dispose of the said vehicle without permission of the authority concerned and shall produce as and when required by the Court.

5. Further proceeding of Confiscation Case No.342(M) of 2017 shall remain stayed till disposal of the Cr.W.J.C. aforesaid and shall be subject to the Cr.W.J.C. aforesaid.

6. With the aforesaid observation, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date15.12.2017 Transmission Date 15.12.2017