Manoj Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6074 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2019 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== MANOJ RAI S/o Mohan Ray Resident of Village- Pandh, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, Distt- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr. Om Prakash Om, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 447 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 95 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6074 of 2020(2) dt.02-03-2020 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateIst, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 95 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T