← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8374/2018disposed

Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-01Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8374 of 2018 ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Son of Late Laxman Rai @ Laxman Pd. Yadav Resident of Village-Gurudah @ Gaus Nagar P.S. Runnisaidpur, District Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Bihar Prohibition, and Excise Department Bihar, Patna.

2. The Excise Commissioner, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Excise Officer, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Department, Arwal (Jehanabad).

4. The District Magistrate, Arwal

5. The Superintendent of Police, District-Arwal

6. The Officer in Charge of Kaler Police Station District Arwal. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vivek Prasad- GP-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 01-05-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Scorpio) bearing Registration No. BR 06-BF-8055, which has been seized in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No. 29/2017 due to violation of the Excise Act. The prayer made in the writ petition is to release the vehicle in question pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case. It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on

Patna High Court CWJC No.8374 of 2018(2) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and aforesaid criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner, on his furnishing two surety bonds to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Arwal and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question or create a third party interest during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case or prejudice the right of the State in confiscation proceeding. The aforesaid vehicle shall be released within one week from the date of furnishing of the sureties.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- U