Bhulan Mehta v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29838 of 2015 (3) dt.16-10-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29838 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2015 Thana -KRITYANAND NAGAR District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Krishnadeo Mehta son of Late Jhaleshwar Mehta, resident of villageAlinagar, P.S. K.Nagar, District-Purnea &
2. Dilip Kumar Mehta, son of Late Jhaleshwar Mehta, resident of villageRoska Koshagarh Ali Nagar, P.S. K. Nagar, District-Purnea .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.45029 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2015 Thana -KRITYANAND NAGAR District- PURNIA ====================================================== Bhulan Mehta Son of Late Jhaleshwar Mehta Resident of Village - Ali Nagar, P.S. K. Nagar, Distt. - Purnea .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.29838 of 2015) For the Petitioners : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta For the Opposite Party : Mr. A.L.Pandit(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.45029 of 2015) For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party : Mr. B.N. Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-10-2015 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State.
The petitioners are languishing in jail since 07.05.2015 and 22.06.2015 respectively in a case instituted under Sections 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation, it is a case of murder of one Vivek
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29838 of 2015 (3) dt.16-10-2015 Kumar on the basis of love affairs.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 07.05.2015 and 22.06.2015 respectively . Chargesheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering of evidence against the petitioners. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. It appears that the petitioners are named in the FIR merely on the basis of suspicion. There is no substantive piece of evidence to suggest their implication. From perusal of the case diary, it appears that there is no circumstantial evidence to show the implication of these petitioners in the present case.
On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the FIR.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnia in connection with K.Nagar P.S.Case No.133 of 2015. (Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T