Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9797/2026rejected

Vishwajeet Kumar Yadav @ Teju @ Teju Yadav @ Vishwajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-25Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9797 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2024 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Vishwajeet Kumar Yadav @ Teju @ Teju Yadav @ Vishwajeet Kumar S/o Virendra Yadav R/o Village - Tetarya Nawada, P.S - Sahar, District - Bhojpur (Arah) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sahar P.S Case No. 116 of 2024 from the Court of learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, one loaded country made pistol with five live cartridges and twenty live cartridges in the box were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and no incriminating articles has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9797 of 2026(3) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 in judicial custody since 22.06.2024. It is next submitted that earlier prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 02.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15717 of 2025.

5. Since, earlier prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 02.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15717 of 2025. This time also there is no fresh ground to consider his prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected once again.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T