Raju Prasad @ Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7582 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2020 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raju Prasad @ Raju Kumar S/O Ramchandra Bhagat R/O Vill. - Bajitpur Maniyapar, P.S - Madhuban,Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 326, 447, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that petitioner along with others being armed with weapon arrived at the door of the informant. It is specifically alleged against this petitioner that he has assaulted Kanti Devi.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that learned trial court has recorded that as per para-31 of the case diary containing injury report of Kanti Devi, she sustained following injuries: (i) pain

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7582 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 and swelling, fracture of 5th Metacarpal bone (ii) base of middle phalanx of right little finger (iii) body-ache caused by hard and blunt object and the nature of injury no. 1 and injury no. 2 is grievous. Learned counsel has further submitted that the injury on head is simple and the injuries on hand are grievous. It has further been submitted that there is also a counter version of this case. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.09.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 312 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., East Champaran, Motihari.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T