← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8288/2026disposed

Mintu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8288 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2021 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Mintu Singh S/o- Dev Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Hathopur PSDaraunda, Dist- Siwan 2.

Binod Singh S/o- Dev Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Hathopur PSDaraunda, Dist- Siwan 3.

Ashok Singh S/o- Dev Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Hathopur PSDaraunda, Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 380, 427, 428, 447, 448, 504 and 506/34.

3. The informant alleges that petitioners along with other accused persons armed with various weapons, entered the house of the informant and on objection they assaulted the sons of the informant and they also looted Rs. 31,000/- from the house of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that specific accusation of assault is against petitioner No. 1, who assaulted the informant's sons. So far rest of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8288 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 petitioners are concerned, there is no allegation of overt act against them.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application and submits that petitioner No. 1 assaulted informant's sons. Injury caused by petitioner no. 1 is grievous in nature.

6. In view of the fact that petitioner No. 1 caused grievous injury, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 1 is refused. However, considering the nature of accusation against petitioner Nos. 2 & 3, the anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 294/2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U