Manoj Urown Alias Timpu Urawn v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18251 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2020 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Manoj Urown Alias Timpu Urawn Son Of Late Kartik Uraon R/O Hajirganj Abdullah Nagar Ps- Sadar District -PURNEA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273/34 of I.P.C. and Sections 30(a), 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that 10 liters wine is recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18251 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2021 2/2 where the other family members also reside. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 10 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Purnea in connection with Sadar P.S. case No.460 of 2020 giving rise to Special Excise case No.550 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U t