M/S Bara Rice Mill, Through Its Proprietor Sri Shailesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16216 of 2017 ====================================================== M/s Bara Rice Mill, Through Its Proprietor Sri Shailesh Kumar Singh son of late Gouri Shankar Singh resident of village Bara P.S. Khokhashi, District Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food Consumer and Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The District Magistrate, Madhepura.
3.
The Certificate Officer, Madhepura.
4.
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation through M.D., B.S.F.C., R - Block, Patna.
5.
The District Manager S.F.C. Madhepura.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Arvind Ujjwal SC4 For the BSFC :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh Mr. Utkarsh Utpal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-06-2025
1. The Writ petition is filed with the following reliefs:- "That this writ petition is being filed by petitioner for issuing of writ/writs for quashing vide order dated 01.07.2017 and vide order No. 62 dated 01.07.2017 in
2/4 Certificate Case no. 10/2014-15 whereby and whereunder the District Certificate Officer, Madhepura has issued attachment of proprietor without any notice to petitioner and without following the section 36 of Arbitration and concilliation Act 1996 and for any other relief(s) for which the petitioner to found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. Without going into the merits of this case, it can be construed that the petitioner has not preferred any appeal provided under Section 60 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914. Without availing the remedy of appeal the present Writ petition is filed to quash the certificate proceeding bearing Certificate Case No. 10 of 2014-15 issued by the 3rd respondent.
3. A detailed counter affidavit is also filed
3/4 by the respondents contending that the Writ petition is itself not maintainable in view of the fact that any order passed under Section 10 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 is appealable under Section 60 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914.
4. On perusal of the record, it is evident that Section 60 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act provides for provision of appeal for orders passed under Section 10 of the PDR Act.
5. Taking into consideration that the petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing an appeal under Section 60 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order before the appropriate authority. The delay in filing the appeal shall be condoned by the authority concerned, and the authority shall dispose of the appeal within three months from the date of filing of the appeal.
4/4
6. With the above said observation, the Writ petition is disposed of.
7. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Spd/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 17.06.2025 Transmission Date