← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4370/2025dismissed

Guddu Kumar v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd.

2025-05-02Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4370 of 2025 ====================================================== Guddu Kumar Son of Ramashish Dube, Resident of Village-Shekhar Niwas, Vikash Colony, Police Station-Alamganj, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Chairman and Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

The Chairman and Managing Director, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

The General Manager (Department of HR and Administration), Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

The General Manager (Department of Finance and Accounts), Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna.

5.

The Office Superintendent of Community Hall, New Punaichak, Patna. 6.

The Accountant General (A and E), Bihar, Beer Chand Patel Path, R-Block, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarva Deo Singh, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the BSPHCL :

Mr. Vivek Prasad, Standing Counsel Mr. Pratiyush Kumar, AC to SC For the Accountant General :

Mr. Vivek Anand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

Patna High Court CWJC No.4370 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-05-2025 It appears that the petitioner has approached this Court on the assumption that because of the respondent giving illegal promotion to its employees, there has been a loss to the public exchequer.

2. We are afraid, this cannot form part of any public interest.

3. The petition has no merits and is, thus, dismissed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Sauravkrsinha/ Praveen-IIU