Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9040/2026dismissed

Pritam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-25Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9040 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2024 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran ====================================================== Pritam Kumar S/O Late Upendra Rai Resident of village- Jahari Pakri (Kewari Kalan), P.S.- Amnaur, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dewanand Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-02-2026 Heard the parties.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Amnour P.S. Case No. 171 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 14.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19892 of 2025 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Amnour P.S. Case No. 171 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of seven cartridges from the petitioner.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2024 and the petitioner is accused in nineteen more

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9040 of 2026(3) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 cases.

5. Considering the facts of the case and the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that till now charges have not been framed,

4. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court finds no ground to review its earlier order.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again with direction to the concerned court below to expedite the trial and frame the charges at the earliest.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T