Chandan Oran v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7150 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- Amdanda District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Chandan Oran S/O Nehru Oran @ Ganju Oran R/O Vill.- Dhangar Sahi Kajha, P.S- Amdanda, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amdanda P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 121(2), 223, 303(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 24.05.2025, while the informant was conducting a government survey, accused Dilip Oran abused him, obstructed the survey, snatched and damaged his belongings, and later chased him with others. At a lonely place, Dilip Oran, Gannu Oran and Chandan Oran (petitioner) assaulted the informant with lathi and iron rod causing head injury and fracture of both legs, and petitioner also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7150 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 looted Rs. 1,500/- and a gold takti from his neck. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 24.07.2025. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. From perusal of the impugned order, injury caused by petitioner is found to be simple in nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being no specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7150 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Amdanda P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T