Most Noorzahan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24494 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -99 Year- 2015 Thana - KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ===================================================
1. Most Noorzahan Wife of Late Md. Yunush.
2. Bibi Murshidha Wife of Md. Gulsher.
3. Nahida Parveen @ Nahid Parveen Daughter of Md. Gulsher.
4. Bibi Jubaida @ Bibi Jebeda Wife of Md. Izhar
5. Shabnam Parveen daughter of Md. Izhar All resident of Village Bela Tedha P.S. Kishanpur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Adv. : Mr. Kamal Kishore Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. B.N.Pandey (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
04. 03.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kishanpur Police Station Case No. 99 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. All the petitioners are ladies. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that all the petitioners are ladies and their implication is based on mere suspicion since they are closely related to the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail but has failed to show from the case diary that any incriminating material has been collected
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24494 of 2016 (4) dt.03-08-2016 there in course of investigation justifying implication of these petitioners.
Considering the facts and circumstances and submission as above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 99 of 2015, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) U T