Sudhir Kumar Ojha @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6926 of 2018 ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar Ojha @ Sudhir Kumar, son of Sri Krishnadeo Ojha, Resident of Village- Lahladpur Patahi, P.S. Muzaffarpur Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna through the Managing Director
4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur
5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur
6. The Station Head Officer, Bela Police Station, District- Muzaffarpur
7. The Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation, Muzaffarpur through the Municipal Commissioner.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, AAG-7 For BIADA :
Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate For P.C.B.
:
Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Binita Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 23-04-2018 With regard to the issue in question, based on a newspaper report, without approaching the authorities concerned, the petitioner has directly filed this writ petition. On the basis of the material that has come on record, we are not inclined to exercise our jurisdiction at this stage. Petitioner may file a detailed representation pointing out the irregularities in the matter before the authorities, namely,
Patna High Court CWJC No.6926 of 2018 dt.23-04-2018 2/2 Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 7 and it would be, at the first instance, for Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 7 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take action as may be permissible under law. In case respondents do not take any action within a reasonable period of time, the petitioner will have liberty to approach this Court afresh in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, we dispose of the writ petition. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 24.04.2018 Transmission Date