← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8234/2022dismissed

Anil Kumar Singh @ Sandesh @ Rakesh Mishra @ Anil Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-25Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8234 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2017 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Anil Kumar Singh @ Sandesh @ Rakesh Mishra @ Anil Kushwaha Son Of Late Subhag Singh @ Subhag Singh Kushwaha R/O Village- Kaser, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Dist.- Kaimur At Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Adhaura P.S. Case No.06 of 2017 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 342, 435, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act as also 10/13 of the U.A.P Act and 17 of the C.L.A. Act.

The petitioner herein has ten criminal cases against him which amongst the other include cases under Section 302/34, Section 384, Section 307, Section 364 etc. of the Indian Penal Code and in this present case, it is alleged that he along with other accused after making unlawful assembly came at the site of the road construction and torched several vehicles related to the construction work. The further allegation is that they assaulted the workers engaged in construction work and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8234 of 2022(2) dt.25-04-2022 2/2 intimidated them by opening fire in the air.

The matter is of 2017 and it was only in February 2021 that the petitioner came into judicial custody. Taking into account all the aforesaid factors, it is clear that the petitioner is a habitual offender and in the said facts and circumstance considering the grave allegations against him in the FIR it would not be proper to enlarge him on bail. The bail application is accordingly rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T