← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18260/2021bail rejected

Anil Yadav @ Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-01Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18260 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2017 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== ANIL YADAV @ ANIL KUMAR SINGH Son of Mahavir Yadav Resident of Village - Maniyara, P.S.- Tiyar, Dist.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Mishra, Adv Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh No.1, Adv Ms. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 225 of 2019 arising out of Bihiya P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 307, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

In view of the report submitted vide letter dated 02.11.2021, the Additional District and Sessions Judge-XV, Bhojpur at Ara has informed that trial has been proceeded.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18260 of 2021(3) dt.01-12-2021 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2017 in the present case. He further submits that only one prosecution witness has been examined till date of submission of this report. In that view of the matter, the Court below is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously within a period of three months.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner may advise his client to renew the prayer for bail if no substantial progress takes place within the aforesaid period. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T