Reyaz Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6458 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-902 Year-2023 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Reyaz Alam Son of Mainuddin Resident of Village - Sipah Khas, P.S. - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rehana Khatoon Reyaz Alam At Mohalla Dargah, P.S. Gopalganj Town, District Gopalganj 2.

Rehana Khatoon Wife of Reyaz Alam Resident of Village / At - Mohalla - Dargah, P.S. - Gopalganj Town, District - Gopalganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Javed Aslam For the State :

Md. Ataur Rahman For the Complainant :

Mr. Dhramveer ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 902 of 2023, Trial No. 1206 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and 323 of the IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, marriage of the complainant was solemnized with the petitioner in the year 2004. Two children were born out of wedlock of the couple and at the time of lodging of the complaint they were aged about 15 years and 11 years. As per allegation, the petitioner along with his family members

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6458 of 2025(4) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 assaulted the complainant misbehaved with her and inflicted atrocities on her.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, the petitioner had purchased a piece of land in favour of the complainant but she sold the same without intimation of the petitioner and it was the reason for discord between them. It has further been submitted that the complainant has obtained an exparte order of maintenance from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gopalganj and the petitioner is continuously making the payment and also promised to continue the same.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. The petitioner is making payment of the maintenance amount granted by the competent Court.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 902 of 2023, Trial No. 1206 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 with further condition that the petitioner shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6458 of 2025(4) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 bear the expenses incurred on the marriage of his daughter who is residing with the complainant, otherwise the learned Court below will be at liberty to pass any order, which he thinks proper and appropriate, including the cancellation of the bail bond, during the pendency of the trial.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T