Sugandhi Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16135 of 2017 ====================================================== Sugandhi Devi wife of Tarkeshwar Pandey, resident of Village- Darauda, Police Station- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchyati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

3.

The District Programme Officer, Siwan.

4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum- Chief Executive Officer, District Board, Siwan.

5.

The Director, National Highway 85, Chapra.

6.

The Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Nath Dubey, Adv.

Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.

Mr. M. Alam, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-04-2023 The writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of writ / writs, order/orders, direction/directions to the Respondent No. 2 to enquire the matter about the construction of the shop on the National Highway 85 Chapra without taking any sanction or without publishing any notice at Daraunda in the District of Siwan and taking appropriate action in this matter and further direct the Respondent No. 4 to stop the illegal construction and allotment and

Patna High Court CWJC No.16135 of 2017(2) dt.24-04-2023 2/2 further direct the respondents to re-examine the matter and remove the illegal construction which was constructed without any approval of the Respondent No. 5 and further for any relief or reliefs as the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Siwan, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

It is needless to state that in case, appropriate representation is filed by the petitioner before the District Magistrate, Siwan, within a period of four weeks from today, he shall pass a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks, thereafter. The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U