Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7805 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Katihar ====================================================== Shankar Yadav Son Of Ram Avtar Yadav Resident Of Village- Madhura, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kiran Devi Wife Of Shankar Yadav D/O Tulsi Yadav Resident Of VillageDwashya, P.S.- Dandkhora, District- Katihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mrs.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. case No.05 of 2020 registered under Sections 498A, 323, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7805 of 2022(2) dt.25-02-2022 2/3 there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Cognizance has been taken under Section 498(A) of I.P.C. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with Mahila P.S. case No.05 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The petitioner is directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioner does not co-operate during the trial, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7805 of 2022(2) dt.25-02-2022 3/3 If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T