Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18293/2021bail rejected

Rajan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-15Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18293 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-443 Year-2020 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Rajan Ram, Male aged about 30 years, Son of Vishun Ram, Resident of Madhuban Kanti, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2021 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Choudhary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Meena Singh, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 66 of 2020, arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 443 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under Sections 20/ 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (N.D.P.S.).

The allegation is regarding recovery of 150 gm of Charas from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that apart from the present case petitioner has been made accused in four other cases. He further states that from the impugned order it reflects that petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18293 of 2021(3) dt.15-11-2021 2/2 in custody since 30th September, 2020.

Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the material available on record as also considering the stringent provision of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985 and further taking into account the commercial quantity of Charas, which has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, I do not deem it fit and proper to allow the petitioner the privilege of bail, hence the present petition stands dismissed.

(Purnendu Singh, J.) Anand Kr.

U T