Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8568/2019bail granted

Vikash Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-26Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8568 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sheohar * ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Rai, aged about 19 years, Male, Son of Ram Swarth Rai, Resident of Village - Belwa Narkatiya, P.S. Piprahi, District- Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhubala Verma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with C2-116 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is recovery of 18 liters Nepali liquor from the vehicle of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 19.12.2018.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8568 of 2019(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Sheohar, in connection with C2- 116 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T