Nandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46042 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2014 Thana -RIVILGANJ District- SARAN ====================================================== Nandan Singh, S/O Surendra Singh, Resident of Village- Shreenagar, P.S. Bairiya, District- Ballia (U.P.).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renuka Ratnakar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Revilganj P.S. Case No. 92 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, Pulsar Motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR04P-4092 of the informant was snatched by three motorcycle borne criminals at the point of revolver.
Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., his name has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Niraj Kumar Singh @ Kanchan and Raju Patel, the petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2015, but he has not been put on T.I.P. and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46042 of 2015 (3) dt.08-01-2016 2/2 The learned A.P.P. submits that looted motorcycle was recovered and Barkatta P.S. Case No. 132 of 2014 has been lodged.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and as such the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chhapra in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 92 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) manish/- U T