Rajeev Kumar @ Tappu v. The State Of Bihar
1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56618 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -451 Year- 2014 Thana -ALAMGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar @ Tappu Son of late Ramayan Prasad, Resident of Paschami Toli, Town, Police Station- Ara, Bhojpur, at present -M.I.G. 283, Lohia Nagar, Police Station -Kankarbagh District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gajendra Prasad Yadav (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and informant.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 451 of 2014 registered for offences under sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioner is a history sheeter with the identical nature of cases. He has adopted a modus operandi to take the money in the name of making arrangement of job, for that, he used to take huge amount from the candidate.
In the present case, allegation has been made against the petitioner to have taken Rs. 7,50,000/- in the name of making
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56618 of 2015 (3) dt.05-02-2016 2/3 arrangement of job in Railway, but he could not arrange the same for the informant.
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been remanded in the present case on 8th January 2015 and he is ready to pay Rs. 2,00,000/- to the informant within one month.
In view of such submission, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 451 of 2014, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.
In failure to pay the aforesaid amount to the informant within one month from the date of release from the jail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56618 of 2015 (3) dt.05-02-2016 3/3 custody, the bail of the petitioner will be treated to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T