← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17868/2017disposed

Siddharth Shankar Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-25Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17868 of 2017 =========================================================== Siddharth Shankar Pathak, S/o Late Dr. Rama Kant Pathak, resident of VillageHaripur Ailoth, P.S.- Musri Gharari, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga, through its Registrar.

4. The Vice- Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

5. The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, G.P. 20 For the L.N.M.U.

:

Mr. Jawed Gaffar Khan, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and L.N. Mithila University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University').

2. Second supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the University giving details of the payment made which comes to almost Rs. 35 lakhs.

3. In view of the aforesaid, substantial payments having been made, the writ petition stands disposed off.

4. However, if it transpires that any amount has remained unpaid, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation before the Registrar of the University. If such a representation is filed within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed off

Patna High Court CWJC No.17868 of 2017 dt.25-06-2018 2/2 by a reasoned order. If it transpires that any further amount is required to be paid to the petitioner, the same shall also be paid within four weeks from the date of passing of the order. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U