← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10649/2023bail granted

Ram Shukh Yadav @ Ram Shukh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10649 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2022 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAM SHUKH YADAV @ RAM SHUKH KUMAR YADAV S/o Ram Narayan Yadav @ Ramnarayan Yadav R/o village- Kadwahi, P.S.- Bashopatti, Distt- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that 27 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 27 liters wine is recovered from two motorcycles. The motorcycles in question do not belong to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10649 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/3 of secret information as per F.I.R. The source and genuineness of the secret information has not been disclosed by the prosecution. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-2nd-cum- Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. case No. 210 of 2022, G.R. No. 2009 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10649 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 3/3 Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T