← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15528/2017dfd for non appearance

Rinki Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-12-11Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15528 of 2017 ====================================================== Rinki Kumari D/o Late Rajeshwar Singh, resident of Village P.O.- Sona Gopalpur, P.S.- Sona Gopalpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Programme Officer, Patna.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Sampatchak, Patna. 6.

The Block Education Officer, Sampatchak, Patna. 7.

The District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Patna through its Secretary.

8.

The Secretary, District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Patna through its Secretary.

9.

The Gram Panchayat, Chipura Khurd, P.S. Sampatchak, District Patna through the Panchayat Secretary.

10.

The Mukhiya, Chipura Khurd, P.S. Sampatchak, District- Patna. 11.

The Panchayat Secretary, Chipura Khurd, P.S. Sampatchak, District- Patna. 12.

Nita Kumari, wife of Bajrangi Kumar Singh, D/o Bimal Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Baruna, P.O. Chipura Khurd, P.S. Gaurichak, District Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.M. Pd. Yadaw-Gp23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-State is present.

2. By previous order dated 13.11.2025, this matter was adjourned by way of last chance making it clear if on the next date, the petitioner is not keen to press the writ application,

Patna High Court CWJC No.15528 of 2017(3) dt.11-12-2025 2/2 then this Court may consider it dismissing it for nonprosecution.

3. Today again nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner, hence the present writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U