Ganauri Ram @ Ganouri Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45197 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2014 Thana -NAWINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Ganauri Ram @ Ganouri Ram S/o Surajdeo Ram, resident of VillageChandragarh, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, co-accused Laukesh Ram called Praveen Kumar, the grand-son of the informant and took away and thereafter his dead body was found and it is claimed that the petitioner and other co-accused after tearing his stomach, killed the deceased.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no eye witness of the occurrence, co-accused Laukesh Ram and Mukesh Ram were also named and in the confessional statement

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45197 of 2015 (4) dt.01-02-2016 2/2 of co-accused Ganouri Ram, also their names have come, have already been allowed bail and the case of the petitioner is similar to that of co-accused Mukesh Ram and, as such, the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 31.08.2014, deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the case of the petitioner is on better footing to that of Laukesh Ram. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M., Aurangabad arising out of Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2014 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T