Lakshmi Prasad Nayak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.770 of 2016 Arising out of Araria P.S. Case No. 356 of 2013, P.S. Araria, District Araria ====================================================== Lakshmi Prasad Nayak, S/o late Ramyash Nayak, R/o Mohalla Adarsh Nagar, Ward no. 16, Police Station, District Araria .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Officer-in-Chare, Araria Police Station, Araria
3. The Superintendent of Police, Araria, District Araria
4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Purnia
5. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga
6. The Additional Director General of Police (Weaker Section), Bihar, Patna
7. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna
8. Jabintara Khatoon (Daughter of Ataur Rahman) wife of Manjar Alam @ Bhola, @ Jabintara Devi @ Tara Devi wife of Ramprit Rajak (Ex. A.S.I. of Police, Araria) resident of village Nagwara, P.S. Katra, District Muzaffarpur at present resident of Mohalla Om Nagar, Ward No.8, P.S. and District Araria.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramanand Poddar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Harish Kumar, Government Pleader No.8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 23-09-2016 Heard Mr. Ramanand Poddar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Harish Kumar, learned G.P.8, appearing for the State respondents.
Having regard to the fact that upon investigation in Araria P.S. Case No. 356 of 2013, charge sheet has already been submitted, under Sections 384/469/330/323/447/504, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. It has, however, been contended on behalf of the petitioner that the appropriate provisions of law have not been
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.770 of 2016 (4) dt.23-09-2016 mentioned with regard to offences, which have been committed, according to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, by the accused persons. This is an aspect, which has to be looked into, and decided by, the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition is closed and is accordingly disposed of. (I.A. Ansari,CJ) A.I./- U T