Md. Raja v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8720 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2024 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Md. Raja S/o Md. Jamal @ Jamal Resident Of Village- Islampur, Gajipur, PsTarapur, Distt.- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Indu Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2025 Heard Mr. Indu Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No. 196 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 31.07.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the First Information Report, the informant alleged that on 31.07.2024, petitioner along with other accused persons arrived at her house and started abusing. It is further alleged that they assaulted the informant and her family members.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8720 of 2025(4) dt.16-06-2025 2/3 petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons that they assaulted the informant and her family members and but the injury report of the injured persons suggest that injury is simple in nature.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner has clean antecedent and injury sustained by the injured persons is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.III-cum-Sub Judge, Munger in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No. 196 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8720 of 2025(4) dt.16-06-2025 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T