← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13180/2016disposed

Md. Salahuddin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-03Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13180 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Salahuddin, Son of late Abdul Shakoor, Resident of Mohalla-Purani Karimganj, Police Station-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Gaya.

3. The S.D.O., Sadar, Gaya.

4. The C.O., Manpur (Anchal), Gaya.

5. The Officer-Incharge, Mufassil Police Stationl, Gaya.

6. Asrar Ahmad, Son of late Abrar Ahmad, Resident of Mohalla-Dhami Tola, Bank Road, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Gaya.

7. Anjani Kumar, Son of Uday Shankar Sharma.

8. Dhanwanti Devi, Wife of Mahesh Kumar, Resident of Sabal Chak, Police Station- Wazirganj, District-Gaya.

9. Phool Kumari Devi, Wife of Ramesh Kumar, Resident of Jani Bigha, Plice Station- Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Zeyaul Hoda For the Respondent/s :

MD.Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2017 Heard Mr. Zeyaul Hoda, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG-12 for the respondent-State. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to respondent no.3, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Gaya to comply/implement his own order dated 02.05.2013, passed in Miscellaneous Case No. 3750 of 2011, as contained in Annexure-1, whereby respondent no.4, the Circle Officer, Manpur was directed to attach the disputed land in question with the help of respondent no.5, the Officer In-Charge, Mufassil Police Station, Gaya, in a proceeding under Sections 145 and

Patna High Court CWJC No.13180 of 2016(3) dt.03-11-2017 2/2 146 of the Cr. P.C. Further prayer has been made to restrain the private respondent nos. 6 to 9 to stop the construction over the land in question.

In view of this Court, since, this is not in dispute that proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr. P.C. is still pending, hence the remedy available to the petitioner is by filing appropriate application before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Gaya, who will consider the same and try to dispose of the proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr. P.C. expeditiously. Accordingly, with the above observation and direction, the present writ application is disposed of.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U