Suro Mahton v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44453 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. SULO YADAV son of Ramautar yadav Resident of Village Suja Toal, Mufassil Distt. Begusarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.46453 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. Suro Mohton, S/o Lalo Mahto, R/o Vill. - Mahmadpur, P.S. - Begusarai Town, District - Begusarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.44453 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.A.Haque Sahara(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.46453 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2016 Both the above stated petitions arise out of Muffasil P.S.Case No. 156 of 2015 registered under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Accordingly, both the above stated petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44453 of 2015 (3) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioners are named in the first information report with accusation that they along with other accused mercilessly assaulted the deceased by means of lathi and other weapons. The post mortem report of the deceased reveals that several injuries were found on the person of the deceased and family members of the deceased claimed to have seen the actual killing of the deceased.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioners and accordingly, their prayer for bail in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No. 156 of 2015, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai stands rejected , at least , at this stage.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T