← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3907/2019disposed

Sundar Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-05Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3907 of 2019 ====================================================== Sundar Kumar Chaudhary Son of Ramchandra Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Kapatia, P.O. and P.S. and District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 3.

The Sub Divisional officer, Rajgir, District- Nalanda. 4.

The District Supply Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 5.

The Supply Officer, Rajgir, Nalanda.

6.

The Supply Inspector, Silao, Rajgir, District- Nalanda. 7.

Shibam Kumar Son of Shiv Kumar Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Kapatia, P.O. and P.S. Nalanda, District- Nalanda.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-07-2019 It appears that the petitioner has moved this Court seeking quashing of the selection of respondent no. 7 for grant of PDS Shop license which according to the petitioner has been wrongly granted de hors to the claim of the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner belongs to scheduled caste and was eligible to participate in the process for grant of the fair price shop license. He has raised his grievance vide Annexure '2' to the writ application before the District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif (Respondent No. 2). In his representation, he has alleged that the selected candidate Shibam Kumar is unmarried,

Patna High Court CWJC No.3907 of 2019(2) dt.05-07-2019 2/2 he is living with his father and his father is a teacher in a Government High School.

Learned counsel for the State submits that since the petitioner has represented his case before the District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif (Respondent No. 2), the District Magistrate may be directed to look into the same and take an appropriate decision thereon.

Having heard the parties and on perusal of the records, this Court is of the considered opinion that in the nature of the complaint made by the petitioner, the District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif shall look into the same, examine the matter and take an appropriate decision thereon after hearing all concerned within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

This writ application stands disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ved/vats U