Mannu Kumar @ Mannu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7615 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2025 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Mannu Kumar @ Mannu Yadav S/O Vishundev Yadav R/O Village- Atalkha Ward no. 05, P.S.- Patarghat, Dist.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2026 This case is being heard on the basis of mentioning slip as the father of the petitioner has died and Saradh ceremony has to be held on 03.03.2026.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
4. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have fired upon the informant.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was not named in the First Information Report whereas other co-accused persons were named. The name of the petitioner transpired during the course of investigation on the basis of CDR as there were several telephonic conversations with co-accused Amit Kumar who has already been granted bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7615 of 2026(3) dt.27-02-2026 2/2 by this Court vide order dated 26.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12429 of 2026. Further, the petitioner has also not been put on TIP and he is in custody since 11.09.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted.
6. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail.
7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 307 of 2025, subject to the conditions that: (I) One of the bailors will be a family member/close relative.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date till conclusion of trial and if the petitioner does not appear on two consecutive dates without any substantial and satisfactory reason, the learned court below would be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T