Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18795/2021bail granted

Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18795 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2020 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== PINTU KUMAR Son Sanjay Sah Resident of Village-Shripur, Ward No.-7, P.S.-Sheohar, District-Sheohar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25/26 of the section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2020 for recovery of a country made pistol from his possession. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Investigation is complete. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the rival submissions of the parties, materials available on the record and the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18795 of 2021(2) dt.09-07-2021 2/2 Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in Sheohar Police Station Case No. 398 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T