← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/2852/2017dismissed

Sita Devi v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Collector, Patna, District Patna And ORS

2022-12-02Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2852 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Sita Devi Wife of Late Lala Rai, Resident of Village- Goraya Asthan Naga Tola, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, Through The Collector, Patna, District Patna 2.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-Division, Danapur, District- Patna. 3.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Danapur, District- Patna. 4.

The Block Development Officer, Maner, District- Patna. 5.

The Circle Officer, Maner, District- Patna.

6.

The Superintendent of Police Rural Patna, District Patna. 7.

The Officer-in-Charge, Police Station- Maner, District- Patna. 8.

Ram Krishna Singh, Son of Late Mithila Singh, 9.

Umesh Singh, 10.

Mukesh Singh, Both sons of Ram Krishna Singh, Sl. No. 8 to 10 all resident of Village- Goraya Asthan, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the State :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha, SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-12-2022 No one has appeared for the petitioner.

This writ application has been filed seeking a direction to the official respondents to handover the possession of the disputed land bearing plot no. 580 and 581 measuring an area of 2 Kathas over which the petitioner's husband Late Lala Singh and Babu Saheb Singh are said to have constructed residential house and in which their family members were residing.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2852 of 2017(2) dt.02-12-2022 2/2 A perusal of the writ application shows that the petitioner has certain dispute with Respondent no. 8 and she claims to have been ousted by the respondent no. 8 from the said house.

In the nature of dispute present in the writ application, the reliefs prayed in the writ application can not be granted. This application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedy in appropriate jurisdiction before the competent court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) tusharika/- U