Lalmati Devi v. The State Of Bihar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17812 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.1. Sangita Devi Wife of Binod Singh, Resident of Village - Matepur, P.S. - Kolwan, P.S. - Chandi, District - Nalanda.

1.2. Sobha Devi Wife of Ranjit Singh @ Mantu Singh Resident of Village Madhopur Samnahua, P.O. - Madhopur Samnahua, P.S. - Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

1.3. Gayatri Devi Wife of Rajiv Singh @ Papu Singh, Resident of Village - Kolwan, P.O. - Kolwan, P.S. - Harnaut, District- Nalanda. 2.

Safalta Devi wife of Ramanand Prasad Resident of village - Dawarika Bigha, P.O. - Chero, P.S. - Harnaut, District - Nalanda. 3.

Ramkalesh Singh Son of Late Mundrika Singh Resident of village - Dawarika Bigha, P.O. - Chero, P.S. - Harnaut, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 4.

The District Collector, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 5.

The Additional Collector, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 6.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Nalanda at Biharsharif. 7.

The Circle Officer Harnaut, District - Nalanda. 8.

Ram Balak Singh son of Late Ramdeo Singh Resident of village - Dawarika Bigha, P.O. - Chero, P.S. - Harnaut, District - Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP14 Mr. Ram Shankar Prasad, AC to GP14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred for : (i) For setting aside order dated 19.9.16 passed in BLT case no 718 of 2015 passed by Hon'ble Justice Smt. Mridula Mishra, Chairman The Bihar Land Tribunal Patna, whereby and

Patna High Court CWJC No.17812 of 2016(3) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 where under by reversing the order of Revisional court of commissioner Patna passed in Revision case no 548/12, has been allowed on apparently erroneous findings and facts. (ii). For any other relief reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. It is informed by Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter relates to pre-emption and with the change of law, it has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T