← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7718/2026bail rejected

Govind Yadav @ Dhoni Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7718 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Govind Yadav @ Dhoni Yadav Son of Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Singh Resident of village - Bijhaura, Police Station - Itarhi, District - Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BNSS, 2023') for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with S.T. No.277 of 2023, arising out of Buxar (Town) P.S. Case No. 147 of 2021, lodged on 08.03.2021, under Sections 399/402/120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25(1-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 02.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.49717 of 2024.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7718 of 2026(5) dt.08-05-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2021. He submits that on the previous occasion a report regarding stage of the Trial was called for.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that report has come.

6. Upon perusal of the report, it transpires that the case is running at the stage of argument.

7. In this background, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the Trial and conclude the same at the earliest. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T