Gopalganj Jila Chini Mill Kamgar Union v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1458 of 2018 ====================================================== Gopalganj Jila Chini Mill Kamgar Union (AITUC), Chini Mill Gate Sidhwaliya, Gopalganj, through its Secretary (Vishnu Sugar Gopalganj Unit) Uma Shankar Yadav, son of Late Jagan Yadav, resident of Village- Harbasa, P.O.- Gopalganj, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Labour Commissioner, Patna.
5.
The Deputy Labour Commissioner, Saran Division, Muzaffarpur. 6.
The Labour Superintendent, Gopalganj.
7.
The Principal Secretary, Sugar Cane Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
8.
The Cane Commissioner, Sugar Cane Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
9.
The Cane Officer, Gopalganj.
10.
The Special Cane Officer, Gopalganj.
11.
The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.
12.
The Vishnu Sugar Mills Limited, P.O.- Vishnu Sugar Mills, P.S. and DistrictGopalganj, through its General Manager. 13.
The General Manager, Vishnu sugar Mills Ltd, P.O.- Vishnu Sugar Mills, P.S. and District- Gopalganj.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No-5 For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, A.C. to GP-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-04-2019 In this case, the petitioner has sought relief for publication of tripartite agreement and other incidental reliefs.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1458 of 2018(2) dt.12-04-2019 2/2 It appears that primarily the relief has been sought against the private company, namely, Vishnu Sugar Mills Limited, and as such, this petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may approach the appropriate Forum for redressal of its grievance. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U