Mahanand Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15448 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Mahanand Yadav 2.

Brahmdeo Yadav, 3.

Yoganand Yadav alias Yogendra Yadav, 4.

Sadanand Yadav, 5.

Bhoganand Yadav, 6.

Bishundeo Yadav, All sons of Late Kapildeo Yadav, Resident of VillageGovindpur, P.S.- Pratapganj, Anchal- Raghopur, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Bihar Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar at Patna.

2.

The Collector, Supaul.

3.

The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Birpur, Supaul. 4.

The Circle Officer, Raghopur, Supaul.

5.

Rajendra Yadav, Son of Late Mahanthi Yadav, 6.

Sukhnandan Yadav, Son of Late Mahanthi Yadav, 7.

Lalit Narayan Yadav, Son of Late Mahanthi Yadav, 8.

Savitri Devi, Wife of Shivnandan Yadav, Daughter of Late Mahanthi Yadav, 9.

Heera Devi, Wife of Lakhan Yadav, Daughter of Late Mahanthi Yadav, 10.

Upendra Yadav, Son of Late Mahanthi Yadav, 11.

Bhupendra Yadav, Son of Late Mahanthi Yadav, 12.

Mahendra Yadav, Son of Late Mahanthi Yadav, Respondent no. 5 to 12 all residents of Village- Govindpur, P.S.- Pratapganj, Anchal- Raghopur, District- Supaul.

13.

Malti Devi, Wife of Bajrang Yadav, Daughter of Late Mahanthi Yadav, Resident of Village- Barhara, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. 14.

Shakuntala Devi, Wife of Bechan Yadav, Daughter of Late Mahanthi Yadav, Resident of Village- Nawa Baghar, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam - AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he

Patna High Court CWJC No.15448 of 2017(4) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 does not want to press the present petition as the same has become infructuous.

2. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U