Paro Paswan @ Pramod Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8560 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-517 Year-2021 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.
Paro Paswan @ Pramod Paswan Son Of Late Lakhan Paswan Resident Of Village - Bishahar Tola Paharchak, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- Begusarai. 2.
Dev Paswan @ Dev Kumar Son Of Paro Paswan Resident Of Village - Bishahar Tola Paharchak, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- Begusarai. 3.
Arjun Paswan @ Arjun Kumar Son Of Paro Paswan Resident Of Village - Bishahar Tola Paharchak, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State through video conferencing. After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner nos.2 and 3. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner nos.2 and 3.
The petitioner no.1 seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 448, 380, 308, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8560 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/2 petitioner no.1 is a person with clean antecedent and against him, it is alleged that he was an order giver based on which, the present occurrence took place. It is also submitted that parties are agnates and the occurrence took place on account of land dispute. It is next submitted that it is very easy to implicate an innocent person alleging that he is an order giver.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P. S. Case No.517 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T