Hriday Prakash Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3075 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Hriday Prakash Gupta Son of Late Lakshman Prasad Gupta, S-Block, 185 Dalmianagar, P.O.+P.S.-Dalmianagar, District-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of BIhar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of BIhar. Patna.

4. Veer Kuwar Singh University, Arrah Through Its Registrar.

5. The Vice-Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arah. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the State : Smt. Shilpa Singh- AC to GA-12 For V.K.S.U. Mr. P. K. Verma, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Arvind Nath Pandey.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has filed representation before the Registrar of the university. He submits that the writ application may be disposed of with direction to the Registrar of the university to take final decision on the representation filed by the petitioner for grant of ACP and MACP. Counsel appearing for university submits that the matter requires verification of the relevant records and university may be granted some time so that the relevant documents may be examined and appropriate order in this regard

Patna High Court CWJC No.3075 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018 will be passed.

Considering the aforesaid, this writ application is disposed of with direction to the Registrar of the university to take final decision on the representation as contained in Annexure-5 and in case, the Registrar finds substance in the case of the petitioner for grant of ACP and MACP, the appropriate order in this regard may be passed within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of the order. It is needless to say that if the petitioner is found entitled to grant of such relief, necessary order granting him consequential benefits will be passed within a further period of one month thereafter.

With the aforesaid observation, this writ application is disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) A.K.V./- U