Patna High CourtL.P.A/2187/2016dismissed

Yusuf Haider Khan v. Equbal Haider Khan And ORS

2017-01-31Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2187 of 2016 Arising out of SA 439 of 2012 Along with Interlocutory Application No. 9858 of 2016 =========================================================== Yusuf Haider Khan Son of late Akhtar Hussain Khan, Mohalla- Doolighat, P.S.Khajekalan, Patna City, Distt-Patna .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. Equbal Haider Khan, son of Late Akhtar Hussain Khan, Mohalla, Doolighat, Patnacity, P.S.-Khajekalan, Distt.-Patna.

2. The State Bank of India, a Nationalised Bank having Head Office at Bombay and a Branch Situated at Mohalla Gulzarbagh, P.O.- Alamganj, Distt.- Patna.

3. The Rigional Manager, The State Bank of India Regional Office, Regional ,Jeevan Deep Building,Exhibition Road, Patna and Bost Box No.169 , P.O.- Gandhi Maidan, Dist.Patna

4. The Branch Manager, The State Bank of India, Gulzarbagh Branch, P.S.- Alamganj, P.O.-Gulzarbagh, Dist.Patna

5. Sri B.N.Bash,Branch Manager ,State Bank of India, Gulzarbagh Branch, P.S.- Alamganj, Dist.Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Yusuf Haider Khan (in person) For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) Date: 31-01-2017 Interlocutory Application No. 9858 of 2016:

The application is for condonation of delay of 2 years 43 days in filing of the present Letters Patent Appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, we find that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay.

Patna High Court LPA No.2187 of 2016 dt.31-01-2017 Consequently, we condone the delay in filing of the present Letters Patent Appeal.

Interlocutory Application stands allowed accordingly. Letters Patent Appeal:

The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against an order passed in Second Appeal No. 439 of 2012. There is no intra Court appeal maintainable against the order. Consequently the appeal is dismissed.

It shall be open to the appellant to avail such other remedy as may be available to the appellant in accordance with law. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) S.Pandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 03.02.2017 Transmission Date NA