← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2239/2026disposed

M/S Priyadarshi Resort And Hotel Ltd v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-12Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2239 of 2026 ====================================================== M/s Priyadarshi Resort and Hotel Ltd through its Director, Manish Priyadarshi, Male, aged about 46 years, son of Shri Krishna Bihari Prasad Sinha, resident of Mohalla Vishwesharaiya Nagar, Flat No. 11, Bailey Road, P.S. Rupaspur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Collector, Patna.

3.

The Additional Collector, Patna.

4.

The Circle Officer, Danapur, Patna.

5.

M/s Helios Finance and Investment Ltd, a Public Limited Company, along with other group Company Helios Corporation Limited, both having its registered office at Helios Bhawan, Station Road, P.S. - Kotwali, District and Town, Patna, present Corporate Office, 3rd Floor, Maharani Complex (Above Union Bank), Anishabad Bypass Road, Patna - 800002, through its Authorized Signatory, namely Mr. Sohail Khan, Son of Late Mokhtar Khan, resident of Flat No. 303, Maharani Complex, Anshabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, District- Patna.

6.

Lalita Sinha, Wife of Shri Jai Pati Sinha, resident of House No. 106, Anandpuri, Boring Canal Road, P.S. Shri Krishnapuri, District and Town, Patna.

7.

Mamta Devi, Wife of Binay Kumar Mantu @ Mantu Mukhiya, resident of Anand Bazar Cant, P.O. Danapur, P.S. Danapur, District Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Anuradha Singh, SC 21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Anuradha Singh, learned SC 21 for the State.

2. Petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:-

Patna High Court CWJC No.2239 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/3 "(I) To dispose of the Jamabandi Cancellation Appeal No.38/2025-26, pending before the Collector, Patna filed by the petitioner, against the order dated 04.03.2025, passed in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No.13/2024-25, by Additional Collector, Patna, by which Jamabandi No.1557, partly, with respect to land bearing Khata No.109, C.S. Plot No.103, Area - 18 katha 4 dhur, situated in Mauza:Babakkarpur, P.S. Phulwari Sharif, present P.S. Danapur, District: Patna, standing in the name of Priyadarshi Resorts and Hotels Ltd., since 2014-15, has been cancelled with a direction to Circle Officer, Danapur, to create jamabandi in the name of Helios Finance and Investment Ltd. and Helios Corporation Ltd and issue lagan receipt in their favour.

(ii) To stay the operation of order dated 04.03.2025, passed in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No.13/2024-25, by Additional Collector, Patna, till the disposal of Jamabandi Cancellation Appeal No.38/2025-23, pending before the Collector, Patna.

(B) Any other relief/s for which the petitioner is found entitled to."

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in compliance of the order passed by the Additional Collector, Patna dated 04.03.2025, the petitioner had immediately filed Appeal within time before Bihar Land Tribunal Patna and the same was disposed of vide order dated 23.06.2025 passed in B.L.T. Case No.731 of 2025, directing the petitioner to file appeal before the District Magistrate concerned against the order dated 04.03.2025 passed by the Additional Collector, Patna. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed the Jamabandi Cancellation Appeal No.38/2025-26 before the District Magistrate, Patna on 30.06.2025 but till date the same is pending.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2239 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 3/3

4. Considering the aforesaid information given on behalf of the petitioner, I find that the provision of subsection(6) of Section 9 of Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011 is efficacious remedy, keeping pending the application of the petitioner for a long period is unwarranted. The District Magistrate is, therefore, directed to forthwith proceed to pass a reasoned order in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all the affected parties.

5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U