← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8648/2022bail granted

Surendra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8648 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2021 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SURENDRA SAHNI Son of Ramsurat Sahni Resident of Village - Madhu Chapra, P.s.- Bairginia, Dist.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rabindra Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against him is of seeking appointment as panchayat teacher based on fake and fabricated marksheet. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that in view of the amnesty given by the Hon'ble Patna High Court, to those teachers who had sought appointment on forged and fabricated marksheet to resign, the petitioner resigned in the year 2016

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8648 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/2 itself. Learned counsel further submits that the said resignation was a little belated as petitioner was not aware that the Hon'ble High Court had given direction to resign within a period of three months, it is next submitted that the present F.I.R. came to be instituted in the year 2021, it is thus submitted that since petitioner had already resigned as such no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to judicial custody. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bairginia P.S. Case No. 206 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/GauravU T