Most. Radha Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8040 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Most. Radha Devi, Widow of Late Madan Mandal, 2.

Subodh Mandal, Son of Late Madan Mandal, 3.

Gangadhar Mandal @ Gangadhar Kumar, Son of Late Madan Mandal Resident of Village- Brahmgyani Pandit Basa Tola, Post OfficeBrahmgyani, Police Station and Anchal- Bhawanipur, District- Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Collector, Purnia. 2.

The Collector of the District of Purnia.

3.

The Additional Collector, Purnia.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer at Dhamdaha within the district of Purnia. 5.

The Anchal Adhikari at Bhawanipur within the district of Purnia. 6.

Smt. Uma Devi, Widow of Late Shailendra Kumar Sinha, No-6 resident of Village- Kapsouna, Police Station and Anchal- Shakund, DistrictBhagalpur. 7.

Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Son of Late Hari Ballabh Narayan Sinha, Originally resident of Village- Rampur, Police Station- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur and at present at Village- Brahmgyani, District- Purnia. 8.

Gholi Devi, Wife of Lucho Ram, 9.

Chameli Devi, Wife of Ganouri Ram, 10.

Runa Devi, Wife of Anil Ram, 11.

Bito Ram, Son of Bhuneshwar Ram, 12.

Lito Ram, Son of Bhuneshwar Ram No-8 to 12 resident of Village- Brahmgyani Kamat Tola, Post OfficeBrahmgyani, Police Station and Anchal- Bhawanipur, District- Purnia. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Sinha with Mr. Arun Prasad Ambastha, Advocates For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Yadav- GP15 Mr. Md. Faiz Ahmad, AC to GP 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2024 Heard Mr. Vinay Kumar Sinha, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Md. Faiz Ahmad, learned Advocate for the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8040 of 2018(2) dt.22-08-2024 2/2

2. After some arguments, learned Advocate for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy available under the law.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid.

(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U