Shamsul Ansari @ Samsul Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9578 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Shamsul Ansari @ Samsul Ansari S/o- Late Basir Ansari R/v- Kasera PsHarlakhi Dist- Madhubani, A/P- Naya Toll Dubhi Bazar Ps- Basopatti DistMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Fahad Khurshid, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 103(2), 109 of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner along with 24 other named accused persons, arrived at the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members with lathi, danda, farsa, sword, due to which some of the persons got seriously injured. In the last part, it is submitted that Sattar Ansari died while he was being rushed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9578 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 to D.M.C.H.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. No specific weapon is attributed to him. It has also been submitted that similarly situated other co-accused persons, namely, Sakina Khatoon and Sakila Khatoon have already been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 88935 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 05.07.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9578 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T