Md. Sakir @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8073 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2018 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar ====================================================== Md. Sakir @ Pappu S/o Md. Tayub, resident of Village- Mahuawa, Amwa Kalan, Ward No. -7, P.S. Piprahi, District-Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan (App156) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case in short is that in course of returning house from Khalihan, the informant's daughter was kidnapped by the accused persons for the purpose of committing illegal act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 20-11-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8073 of 2019(5) dt.17-07-2019 2/2 present case.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. The victim girl is still traceless.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 154 of 2018 is rejected.

Learned trial court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner, preferably, within a period of 9 months from the date of receipt/production of copy of the order.

The District Magistrate and the Superintendent of Police, Sheohar are directed to ensure the production of prosecution witnesses on the date fixed by the trial court, so that the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Magistrate and the Superintendent of Police, Sheohar for needful.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T